NO CHARGES FOR SAVING PEOPLE'S DEMOCRACY Whether you call him "
PENSIONS", whether they call it "
SPECULATION " is always on the popular savings
I want to get your hands on that money, that is, on that income (already taxed!) put aside for future workers, families, older people.
ALL POWERFUL, Housekeeper, BOSS THAT REQUIRES A NEW FEE OR INCREASES A TAX ALREADY 'AND EXISTING'
a tyrant and a robber , REGARDLESS OF WHAT AND WHO IS TO BE A TAX.
NO CHARGE AND 'NEVER A FAVORE DEL POPOLO, TUTTE LE TASSE SONO CONTRO IL POPOLO .
GLI ULTRARICCHI, LE FAMIGLIE PADRONE DEGLI STATI, LE TASSE NON LE EVADONO, LE RISCUOTONO.
The savings of the citizens are already taxed heavily by the inflation.
A further taxation on the savings and/or on the revenues of savings is iniquitous and predatory.
Inflation is one of the more heavy taxes, hitting the savings and the purchasing power of the citizens.
Inflation is used for finance piloted public expences, printing new paper money that inflates present paper money, that is to say the liquidity owned by citizens.
The families of saving worker people come so impoverished, and their wealth, their purchasing power robbed by inflation goes to enrich the families of the beneficiaries of the public expence, beneficiaries arbitrarily designated.
Instead is good and right that the wealth that every family should have is determined by the merits, virtue, intelligence, cautiousness, probity of that family, and not by who controls the state, the tax authorities, the public expence and the coin of money.
Only a golden money or a gold-linked money would preserve the savings and the purchasing power of the citizens, of the productive classes.
For all this:
NO TAX ON SAVINGS AND ON THE REVENUES FROM SAVINGS
NO TAX ON PERSONAL FINANCE INVESTMENTS
NO TAX ON BONDS, STOCKS, YIELDS, DIVIDENDS AND CAPITAL GAINS.
savings of citizens are already heavily taxed by inflation. further taxation on savings and / or savings income is unfair and predatory.
Inflation is one of the heaviest taxes, hitting the economy and the purchasing power of citizens.
inflation is used to finance public spending driven by printing new paper money that goes to inflate the existing paper money, ie cash in the hands of citizens. Working families are so impoverished savers and wealth their ravaged by inflation goes to enrich the families of the beneficiaries of public spending, arbitrarily designated beneficiaries and patronage.
E 'instead of just the rich that every family should have to be determined on the merits, virtues, intelligence, dall'accortezza, the probity of that family, and not by those who control the state, taxation, government spending and the issuance of currency. A gold coin or gold closely anchored to save the savings and purchasing power of citizens, productive classes.
For all this:
NO TO SAVE ON TAXES ON INCOME AND SAVINGS (hypocritically called "financial returns" from those who want to live on the shoulders of others, by those who want to steal other people's money, who wants to steal the money if those who they are sweaty).
NO TO THE TAXATION OF BONDS, BONDS, SHARES, INTEREST, DIVIDENDS AND CAPITAL GAINS.
WHY 'NOT INCREASE YOUR INCOME TAX ON FINANCIAL Consider the following hypothesis. I have € 10,000 of hard-earned cash, we buy a bot that makes me 4% annual GDP, or € 400. Inflation, that is the loss in value, purchasing power of my savings caused by rising prices, is also 4% a year. So you devalue my savings of 400 € each year. Calculated:
400 € 400 € to yield less inflation equals 0.
Inflation is a tax, in fact, is the heaviest and most insidious tax that the state imposes on us, so my yield of 400 € I have already eaten all dall'inflation tax.
But not enough on all of € 400 nominal gross return must also pay state tax substitution of 12.5% today, just want to do now that setting almost doubled to 20%. Yet included 12.5%: 12.5 400 * / 100 = 50 €.
Then, starting from the initial savings of € 10,000 and considering their real purchasing power: 400 €
of return - inflation tax of € 400 - € 50 tax replacement = - (meno!) 50 €. My
unprecedented "income" by wealthy financial speculators is negative, I've put on 450 € 50 € giving the state.
But we all know that real inflation is well above 4% official, we fact over 10% per year. Enjoy you to charge my incredible income by calculating the actual inflation ...
not understand? Then consider the second hypothesis.
Ten years ago, in 1998, with 150,000 euro bought us a nice apartment near the center. I've bought and I have invested in Treasury bills and low-risk funds. With yields obtained (net of substitute tax paid on them) in ten years I came to € 200,000. Today I need to buy an apartment: look at the real estate market and I see with my 200,000 euro bought us a yes and no apartment in the suburbs.
ask, passing through the nominal yields, in ten years, from € 150,000 to € 200,000 in 1998 to today, I am enriched or depleted I?
The net revenue of € 50,000 ten years I have offset the devaluation of my savings due dall'inflation tax? Of course not.
To buy this nice apartment near the center in 1998 that cost me all my 150,000 € 300,000 € Today I need (which I have).
Doing the math:
cost € 150,000 in 1998 (and up-front savings) + ten-year net revenue of € 50,000 - € 300,000 cost = current - (meno!) 100,000 euro.
addition to the substitute tax paid during the years, I've got another 100,000 € of inflation tax to the state, and I have drastically depleted.
I have to pay more taxes?
Want to double taxation on my fabulous financial returns?
For those wishing to know more about, I suggest any links to reflect in silence (noise distracts you and keeps you servant):
http://epistemes.org/2008/01/10/dieci-buone- reasons-for-non-tax-to-rent /
Article by Benedetto Della Vedova, and Mario Falasca Piercamillo Seminerio
http://www.tradersxsempre.com/public/forum/index.php?showtopic=1253&pid = 135606 & mode = threaded & start =
(intervention Luciano Priori Fry)
http://www.lewrockwell.com/block/block160.html
(article by Walter Block)
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul334.html
(Article sull'Inflation Tax Ron Paul)
http://www.clubeconomia.it/articoli/articolo.php?id=553
(article by Gian Battista Bozzo)
http://www.libertiamo.it/2010/01/12 / teso-a-boeri-ma-esistono-le-rendite/comment-page-1 / # comment-10224
(Article by Adriano Teso)
http://www.italia-risparmio.it/finanza/rendite_finanziarie_ipotesi_sugli_effetti_di_un_aumento_di_tassazione. php
(Article I)
http://www.fff.org/freedom/0293c.asp
(article by Victor Niederhoffer)
Private property and public property of the state in Hans-Hermann Hoppe
http://www.filosofiapolitica.net/showArticle.asp?ID=03-02-09-Hoppe&IDArea = 03/02/2009 dateReview = 2 & = 0 & & typeMenu showmenu = true
and Principles of Economics privately
http://www.finanzaediritto.it/articoli/principi-di-economia-privatista-4096.html
Wikipedia - Social mobility
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobilit% C3% A0_ (sociology)
www.hanshoppe.com
www.libertarianism.com
www.lp.org
http://democraziaturnaria.splinder.com
www.libertarian.co.uk
http://mises.org
few words about the tax system
http://paolofranceschetti.blogspot.com/2009/08/ what-is-the-financial-crisis-part-2.html
http://paolofranceschetti.blogspot.com/2009/05/il-sistema-in-cui-viviamo-il-sistema.html
www.ronpaul . org
http://propertyandmarket.ilcannocchiale.it/
www.rothbard.it
A fact that should give pause to even those who do not understand economics and leave nothing in the papers of brainwashing scheme
that the increase in taxation on income, that yields the popular savings was in the program of "democratic renaissance" of the "P2" . Who has some more 'brain washed should not understand what should be in which pocket the money stolen from families who save.
PHILIP MATTEUCCI
privatization Economist for Global Free Trade